7 Comments
founding

Integration is the core of healing trauma at multiple levels of scale. What I am learning as a participant in the Irish Pocket Project, focussed on the Great Starvation that more than halved the small island's population, is that such traumas are isomorphic at various levels of scale. If abandonment in early infancy is a core issue then abandonment of care of the vulnerable is even more disruptive at national and governmental levels. The lack of response to what is happening with the brutal killing of children, women and babies, in Gaza, is resonating with most of us. Only those unable or unwilling to access their deepest embodied feelings, are unmoved.

Expand full comment

Excellent! All good wishes for your training and important work.

Expand full comment
Apr 5·edited Apr 5Liked by Matthew Green

Matthew, all power to your bow, amigo. Where you offer that it may seem a strange step for a journalist, it seems to me a natural and more nuanced progression. The throwaway descriptor of the purpose of journalism is often "to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable". This seems pretty central to working with the integration of trauma. If we are to understand trauma as the interruption or damming (that word can be spelled in a number of ways in this context) of natural, inherent, embodied processes, then assisting ourselves and each other to return to the sense of flow is going to be a relief to some, and a challenge to others. Imagine what a trauma-informed journalism would look like? Again, here is another example of where mainstream psychology fails to offer insight into how the dominant paradigm's perception of Self perpetuates trauma. I would suggest that much of this arises from the paradigm's inability to consider and include anything greater than its own anthropocentric, hierarchical, Modernist (string of adjectives here) interests when it comes to addressing Need. Where one is comfortable within this distorted sphere (the Bates Motel!), one is inevitably going to feel challenged. The longer these psychospiritual dimensions are deemed to be purely the purlieu of either religion or personal interest and expression (eccentricity?), they get left out of a conversation that could otherwise lead towards relationships lived in wonder, curiosity, spontaneity, and presence - or, as one might say, in the moment. So, again, good for you.

Expand full comment